(Bloomberg) -- The US Supreme Court has never considered whether former presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for acts they took in office. Before Donald Trump, the court never needed to.

I have been studying and writing about Roman emperors for more ... Trump v. United States. The day began with Donald Trump’s lawyer, D. John Sauer, boldly asserting, “Without presidential ...

Donald Trump might not get the sweeping immunity he wants. Still, the Supreme Court justices do not appear likely to ... to try to make his conspiracies more likely to succeed," Dreeben said ...

Some Supreme Court scenarios... The justices - three of whom were appointed by Mr Trump - could rule former presidents have blanket immunity or hold they do not have any criminal immunity.

Former President Trump ... to do so. More than a dozen retired four-star generals, admirals and other former military leaders filed a Supreme Court amicus brief earlier this month in which they stated ...

The US Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday on whether Donald Trump, as a former president, should be immune from criminal prosecution for acts he committed while in office. Fraser Jackson ...

The cases have major differences, but the biggest is this: The New York courts have moved Trump’s case ... questions about more legitimate assertions of presidential immunity.

Donald Trump’s vow to give police officers “immunity from prosecution ... candidate has on more than one occasion vowed to empower law enforcement to do their jobs without limits, a stark ...

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court on Thursday confronted a major test of the power of the presidency as the justices began hearing arguments over Donald Trump's bid for immunity from prosecution ...