Following the nearly three-hour oral argument about presidential immunity in the Supreme Court on April 25, 2024, many commentators were aghast. The general theme, among legal and political experts alike,

Supreme Court justices believe that they are "writing a rule for the ages," but their focus on hypotheticals has given yet another gift to Donald Trump.

With the nine justices lined up on the bench, Justice Neil Gorsuch wondered how the issue had come to this.“Here we are in the Supreme Court of the United States over a $3,000 claim,” said Gorsuch. “I’m— I’m just wondering why the government’s making us do this.”

Meanwhile: The hush money trial continues, and Arizona announces a new criminal indictment over the fake electors scheme.

Summer, protesters gather at the U.S. Supreme Court while arguments are heard. See how the 2024 docket is rallying activists.

I’ll concede, readily, that in my old age I find it almost unbearable to listen to U.S. Supreme Court arguments. After all, I’ve been studying them, in one format or another, for many decades. This is the bench of Earl Warren,

Donald Trump on Wednesday had some very nice words specifically for the conservative members of the Supreme Court, leading some to say the former president is seeking their favor in his case seeking absolute immunity from all charges in the criminal case stemming from the Capitol riot on Jan.